Page 1 of 1

AMC or TS Tune Analyze Live?

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:36 pm
by portmod7
I have a MS-II v3.0 running 2.92 code. It is on a gen-1 small block Chevy, I have a FAST TBI unit sitting on the intake, 14point7 O2 controller, and am running Ford EDIS ignition.

I have just recently switched to EDIS to work around a timing issue I was fighting, and the 14point7 is also new at the same time to replace a defective LC-1. Now that I am confident in those two things, I am working on getting my VE table tuned in. Using Tuner Studio's "Tune Analyze Live" feature works REALLY great the best I can tell. I am not 100% confident that I have the optimal settings, but it sure seems to be doing a good job. However, I wish there was another way besides carrying a laptop with me everywhere I go.

I tried the AMC feature of MS today for the first time, letting it tune on the drive to work, and on the way home. But when I got home and plugged into the laptop, AMC had only changed 2 cells of my VE table. Tuner Studio works MUCH faster than that. I was wondering if there are certain AMC settings I should try to move the process along a little faster? Here's what I have now:

Automatic Mixture Control: FLASH Update
Step Size(%): 50
Minimum VE Change: 2
Vertex Tolerance(RPM): 250
Vertex Tolerance(kPa): 6
Table Change Interval(sec): 5
FLASH Update Interval(sec): 180
Update After(events): 2

I also attached the msq so you guys can take a look at that.

I also have an Android phone, and I have seen a little bit here and there about TS for Android, should/could I maybe get setup to run TS off my phone and let TS tune my VE that way? I figure I could take it to a tuner with a dyno, but I figured I might get a little more for my money if I let auto tune work it's magic a little more first?


Thanks!

Re: AMC or TS Tune Analyze Live?

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 6:40 pm
by chevelle
Just wondering if anyone ever replied to this as I am kind of wondering the same thing. I've read over, over, over and over the Automatic Mixture control page and at least for me the descriptions of what each setting does seems a little to vague for me to understand just exactly what each setting will do.