The MegaSquirt Project has experienced explosive growth other the years, with hundreds of new MS installations occurring every week - a phenomenal success! MegaSquirt has been successfully used in all aspects of Internal Combustion engine applications including R&D, Industry, Race, and Research. The MS project has transformed itself from a simple R&D project into a full-featured mature engine control system. To reflect this the support structure has also changed to meet the needs of MegaSquirt Users.
Moving forward, the R&D forums for MegaSquirt project are in a read-only mode - no new forum posts are accepted.
However the forums will remain available for view, they still contain a wealth of information on how MegaSquirt works, how it is installed and used. Feel free to search the forums for information, facts, and overview.While the R&D forum traffic has slowed in recent years, this is not at all a reflection of Megasquirt users, which continue to grow year after year. What has changed is that the method of MegaSquirt support today has rapidly moved to Facebook, this is where the vast majority of interaction is happening now. For those not on Facebook the msextra forums is another place for product support. Finally, for product selection assistance, all of the MegaSquirt vendors are there to help you select a system, along with all of the required pieces to make it complete.
For discussing how to choose sensors and create a wiring harness for all Bowling and Grippo versions of the MegaSquirt® EFI controller.
Forum rules Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.
If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).
I am doing a ms2 b&g 2.92 fuel only. In early documentation the tps ground just went to ground. Later documentation has tps ground to pin 19 to help with noise. In my case the tps is shared with the factory gm pcm which all the gm grounds ground to a stud on the intake. Rather than physically solder on the gm ground to MS pin 19 I would like to just run the pin 19 ground to the stud on the intake. All the other MS grounds will ground to that stud. Does anyone see a problem with that
The general rule is *all* sensor grounds go to a ground pin on the MS DB37 connector. And MS is grounded to the block via other pins on the DB37.
If you unplug MS, no sensor should have a ground.
The theory is if you ground a sensor to the block, it will share a high current ground which may well have some 'spikes' on it. The sensor inputs are required to measure tiny currents, and these spikes can interfere with that and give false readings.
Dave P, London UK.
Rover V-8
MSII V3
EDIS
Tech Edge Wideband
I will separate them but I expect it is my limited understanding of grounds. When the grounds get to the MS pins 7 through 19 are all common and that is the part that has me not understanding why they should be separated. I am not questioning I am just trying to understand.
The fellows over on the Extra forum have a pretty diagram that explains why certain grounding arrangements are bad; it has to do with the current flow through the main ground wires causing a voltage offset. By grounding the various sensors directly (and exclusively) to the MS, the trivial current flow means no voltage drop and no sensor reading errors. Also - as you noted - noise can get pretty crazy on the heavy ground wires.