Narrow band O2 vs WB

For discussing B&G MS-I/MS-II set-up and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0). For tuning/troubleshooting questions, please attached a datalog and your MSQ file to your post.

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
73Eldo
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: Mpls/StPaul MN USA

Narrow band O2 vs WB

Post by 73Eldo »

I am currently running a wide band and have always had minor glitches with it. Now its having major issues that are looking like they will take time and money. I was wondering how different a narrow band is going to be to get used to? What range do they display? Once you are out of that range do they tell you if they are rich or lean? I have a pretty good handle on tuning now so I am wondering if I really need to spend the money to maintain the WB. Plan was always to go to a narrow and use the WB on another car.

Any thoughts or opinions are welcome
73 Cadillac Eldorado convert Fairly stock 8.5:1 500cuin/8.2L
MSIIV3,2.88,relay board, LC-1,Older Holley 670cfm 2bbl TBI w/85lbhr injectors.
devastator
Experienced Squirter
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:19 am
Location: Kinda near Tucson Arizona

Re: Narrow band O2 vs WB

Post by devastator »

The NBO2 will only display rich or lean, not the actual AFR like a WBO2 will. If your VE tables are pretty well set, switching to a NBO2 would be useful to keep an eye on them now and then, but I think I'd just remove the O2 sensor altogether and use the WBO2 for another project, or when you need to re-tune MS. Just my 2c. :)
Sandrail-ACVW 2276 cc, Turbo
MS-II W/spark burning E85
The sand must be punished. :twisted:
73Eldo
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: Mpls/StPaul MN USA

Re: Narrow band O2 vs WB

Post by 73Eldo »

So a narrow band will tell me

yes I am running at 14.7:1
i am running somewhere below 14.7:1
i am running somewhere above 14.7:1

and that it?

How does ego correction work off of that? Or doesnt it?
devastator
Experienced Squirter
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:19 am
Location: Kinda near Tucson Arizona

Re: Narrow band O2 vs WB

Post by devastator »

I believe that's what the NBO2 will display. There is a very small amount of variation from lean to rich, and I'd have to read the Megamanual to find out as I've never used EGO, (I'm running Ethanol).
Sandrail-ACVW 2276 cc, Turbo
MS-II W/spark burning E85
The sand must be punished. :twisted:
Mike_Robert
MegaSquirt Guru
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:55 am
Location: FL, USA

Re: Narrow band O2 vs WB

Post by Mike_Robert »

The problem with narrow bands is that they have a very marked "knee" in their response curve and once they're off 14.7, the actual voltage returned is as much a function of their temp as well as the mixture. See the attached graphs. I wish I could give accurate attribution for these graphs but they're at numerous websites and they do reflect known NB behavior as related to temp.

-Mike
voltage_vs_af2.gif
O2_AFR_Temp.gif
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply