Schematics inconsistency?

The forum to discuss:
- V2.2, V3 assembly,
- V2.2, V3 troubleshooting, and
- Connection troubleshooting
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
Philip Lochner
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:18 am
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Schematics inconsistency?

Post by Philip Lochner »

R45 is shown as 1K here : http://www.megamanual.com/ms2/pcb.htm

The parts list show it as 10k and this is how DIYAutoTune delivers it.

Ive had to increase this value to over 10k in order to prevent the VR circuit from being "overdriven" with a VR sensor that produces voltages that are too large for the circuit. My MS was behaving as if it was rev-limiting at 3800rpm.
Best regards
Philip
'74 Jensen Interceptor Mk3 (MS-2 EFI, GPIO + GM 4L60e)
'80 Jaguar XJS 5.3L V12* (MS-2 EFI + dual EDIS-6)
and about 10 others.
Matt Cramer
Super Squirter
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Schematics inconsistency?

Post by Matt Cramer »

That was a running change, but the graphics show the original design.
Post Reply