Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.
If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).
If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days
The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
Reason I ask is I converted a Torker II intake with bungs for MPFI. This is on my Ford 351W. It runs fine, except for a rough spot between 1600-1700 RPM...regardless of engine load. My theory is that there is an airflow issue in the runners of that intake, but I also wondered if injector spray pattern would affect it. I tried some Venom injectors and it idled rougher, but the engine didn't "wobble" at 1600 rpm (I probably could have tuned the idle, but that wasn't the mission). Hence my spray pattern theory. I currently run Ford Racing 30# EV-1 style on it. The another ECU were junk...one cap feel off but luckily got caught in the bung. 3 others were loose (after maybe 10 min of running).
FWIW, the Ford injectors have the 4 small holes, the another ECU had the little needle-looking thing at the pintle.
Trying to decide whether to spend my money at the speed shop helping me look at the tune, trying different injectors, or trying another intake (Super Vic). I just had the Fords cleaned flowed...all matched perfect.
-
- Super Squirter
- Posts: 2951
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:35 am
Re: Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
Re: Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
In the end, I'm likely over-thinking something that will wind up being stupid-simple to solve.

Re: Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
In many production engine applications, injector spray patterns play a minimal role in combustion performance because the spray is usually not aimed at the intake valve. Instead, the spray is aimed at the intake runner wall or floor. This is done for many reasons such as for emissions or packaging constraints. In these cases, atomization occurs after the airflow picks-up the fuel either in flight or as it splashes off the runner. In performance applications where emissions are not an issue, injector aiming should be optimized towards the valve and atomization techniques should be utilized.
So take from that what you will. Doesn't sound too critical, as long as the fuel atomizes off the floor. In the case of most "Spyder" type manifolds, the fuel is actually hitting the floor of the head port just shy of the valve...not the intake floor.
-
- Super Squirter
- Posts: 2951
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:35 am
Re: Spyder style manifolds and injector choice
It's not a huge difference. And I suspect the biggest thing that's affected is emissions, followed by some of the X-Tau AE coefficients.grtskydog wrote:This is just a theoretical physics/fluid dynamics kind of question, mind you. I would think if most "squirt-gun" type injectors didn't work well with the MPFI carb-style manifolds, the alerts would be all over the place on efi boards like this. Likewise, if a certain brand/spray pattern injector was pretty much mandatory for say, a Super Victor EFI, then Edelbrock would certainly have that in their notes...they seem pretty good about that. I would think that kind of info would be all over the web as well.
In the end, I'm likely over-thinking something that will wind up being stupid-simple to solve.