MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.
If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).
If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days
The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
I've been following this thread for awhile as I'm trying to smooth out the SD to MAF bump also using B&G v2.90.
I am sure in TS (v0.999.3) there was a menu where you could select from several of the more common MAF curves, sorta like calibrating the thermistors..., can't find it now though.
Anyway I've copied the maffactor_default.ini to the "mycar/projectcfg" folder as well as the folder "inc" and get the same error you do.
If you look in the MyCar folder there is a file called "maftableburner.log" and all it contains is what I'd call a "header". No errors logged. It should contain all the data that was sent if the log file for O2 calib can be used as an example.
Maybe Phil can tell us what we're doing wrong...
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
The file that TS will use has to be named maffactor.inc. The _default is just so you save the original file. Your files look fine and should work if copied into maffactor.inc.durson1 wrote:I'm using tunerstudio. I put the file in my project folder, in the project config folder which is where my ini is. Here are the 2 I've tried, renamed to maffactor_default.inc. My modified one didn't work so I tried the original unmodified one, that didn't work either.
Again, if it doesn't work I will test it out next Wed.
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
I got it to work. The directions say to name it "maffactor_default.inc" don't do that. Don't name it "maffactor.inc" either. Name it "maffactor" the ".inc" extension is just the file extension.
Use the Excel program that I attached which was created by arr_kid. (Thanks for that. Us excel ameteurs greatly appreciate it)
Load the default maffactor file.
Run the offset to what ever % you want.
Save it. (Whatever the excel program spits out as "newmaffactor" don't peter with it at all. Don't change anything on it.)
Rename it "maffactor"
Put it in your projectcfg folder of your project where your "ini" is.
Start up TS, power up MS, tools, calibrate maf, write to controller.
And it should work.
I loaded the default one, and a few different modified ones this way.
Thanks grippo. I knew that ".inc" was the file extension, but seeing that I should rename my file "maffactor_default.inc" thats exactly what I did. I also, after your last post tried "maffactor.inc" which didn't work either because that named the file "maffactor.inc.inc" with the file extension on there. I guess for us non code writer savey guys things llike that need to be dumbed down a bit. Rename the file maffactor, I would have gotten 1st time.
Thanks again.
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
-
mrselfdestruct1994
- MegaSquirt Newbie
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:49 pm
Re: MAF and MS? part 2 with new 2.900 code
Just FYI I am using an 05+ Ford style MAF in a 2.5" pipe and have it installed in the middle of a 12" straight section. Sitting right on about 5g/sec at idle and it seems very steady, I was able to get it drivable in about 5 minutes on the standard transfer function just by fiddling with the correction table. Heat soak at idle doesn't seem to be an issue any longer and because the signal is so steady I no longer need any MAF/MAP averaging which noticeably improved the throttle response. All good results so far, I'll keep you guys posted.
Cheers,
Sam