MS and the Rover K series

This forum is for discussing ignition setup, tuning, and troubleshooting for MS-II. Click these links for info on GM's HEI, EDIS, direct coil control, others.
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0). For tuning/troubleshooting questions, please attached a datalog and your MSQ file to your post.

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
Rich H
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 am

MS and the Rover K series

Post by Rich H »

Hi all, new to MS and my first post so please bear with me!

I have searched the boards, FAQs, etc and come up with little so a few questions, the car and engine in question is a Lotus Elise with an early Rover K series 1.8, mild tune and with a standard ECU (MEMS) currently. I'm researching weather MS will work with the stock sensors.

The problem comes with the Rover trigger wheel, it is set up with irregular missing teeth. the teeth are at 10 deg intervals and the missing teeth are in a pattern relative to number 1:

TDC
50 deg BTDC
180 BTDC
240 BTDC

Is there any way of getting around this? Is there an alternate option to a trigger wheel? all the other sensors are already fitted and should be fine.

Thanks

Rich
cng1
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: Ely, UK
Contact:

MS and the Rover K series

Post by cng1 »

"Rich H" wrote:
Is there any way of getting around this? Is there an alternate option to a trigger wheel? all the other sensors are already fitted and should be fine.
You either need to add material back into two of the teeth, write a
wheel decoder for that tooth pattern or fit a more "standard" trigger
wheel to your crank pulley. If you do fit a new trigger wheel take
a look at www.trigger-wheels.com

Chris
KLAS
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:11 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Post by KLAS »

my old 1.4l K SPi has a reluctor ring fittet to the flywheel with 36-2 teeth. my idea is to replace the one missing tooth to have a 36-1 and rotate the ring to use it with EDIS
don't know but think that could work with the 1.8 engine too
Rich H
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 am

Post by Rich H »

Thanks gents,

Am I right in thinking that I could use the distributor with a hall probe or similar instead of a crank pos indiactor? I'm confused....
Matt Cramer
Super Squirter
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:35 am

Post by Matt Cramer »

Rich H wrote:Thanks gents,

Am I right in thinking that I could use the distributor with a hall probe or similar instead of a crank pos indiactor? I'm confused....
Many Megasquirt installations use a distributor trigger instead of a crank trigger. If you lock out the timing advance mechanism (if any) and have a trigger wheel inside with four equally spaced teeth (for an inline four), it should be something you can wire in without too much trouble.
FlossUK
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by FlossUK »

Hi there are some really intrestings threads out there about this (i'll post tommorrow)

Re using the the 1.4 k serires ring then unfortantly it will not fit as the flywheel on the 1.8 has the teath cut in instead . the only way to do it would be to mill the whole lot out

What about after market lighted lywheels any ideas ???
Work Hard ! Play harder !! but don't get caught !!
Rich H
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 am

Post by Rich H »

The problem with changing the flywheel is it's a 5 hour job to take the back of the car to bits and the lightened flywheel costs a packet!

I like the idea of a dizzy based system as there is no advance mech and there is plenty of space in the cap for mods. If anyone can point me in the right direction it would be appreciated!

TVM

Rich
FlossUK
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by FlossUK »

Sorry about the delay however the link for k series wheel decoder prblem is

viewtopic.php?t=13502

doesn't make sense to me yet but if one of you understands and more importantly now how to use this info then I'd love to now

Rich: hows the Dizzy solotion looking ? do you need any more info/diagrams for the lotus ?
Work Hard ! Play harder !! but don't get caught !!
Rich H
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 am

Post by Rich H »

Ground to a halt TBH mate! Not had time to delve into it. Looks possible with some mods to the dizzy, needs some time and expert knowledge thrown at it!
Rich H
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 am

Post by Rich H »

Thanks for the heads up on the other thread. Interesting to note that the guy doing the PIC programming has now fitted a 36-1 tothed wheel and a ford sensor.... :(
Post Reply