Acceleration enrichment settings

For discussing B&G MS-I/MS-II set-up and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0). For tuning/troubleshooting questions, please attached a datalog and your MSQ file to your post.

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
JTVOLVO
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: CHICO, CALIFORNIA
Contact:

Acceleration enrichment settings

Post by JTVOLVO »

MSII 2.88, v3.0. In regards to acceleration enrichment, I am using 100% TPS. I am wondering what percentage of TPS vs. MAP one might use.

Thanks,

James
cygnus x-1
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:57 pm
Location: Chicago suburbs

Re: Acceleration enrichment settings

Post by cygnus x-1 »

It's mostly just trial and error, seeing what works best. I think MAP tends to be more accurate if you have a good MAP signal, but TPS is probably better if your MAP signal is very lumpy. But then if your MAP signal is that lumpy you might be better of with alpha-N fueling instead of speed density.

C|
JTVOLVO
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: CHICO, CALIFORNIA
Contact:

Re: Acceleration enrichment settings

Post by JTVOLVO »

Thanks for that, I need to experiment more.

James
Post Reply