Help with Alpha-N

For discussing B&G MS-I/MS-II set-up and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0). For tuning/troubleshooting questions, please attached a datalog and your MSQ file to your post.

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
442olds
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:02 pm

Help with Alpha-N

Post by 442olds »

Ok I think I missed something somewhere. I filled out the alpha-n table and turned it on. But when I started the car it appeared to track like it was still using the MAP sensor.

So if I program the 0% TPS/1000 rpm cell for 30 kPa...I would expect the car when ideling at 1000 rpm and the tps at 0% to be pulling from the 30kpa/1000 rpm cell on the VE table. But it wasn't it...somehow it was pulling from the 85~90 kPa cell like it did when I was using Speed Density.

Is there something I need to switch other than the settings in the software? Oh I was using Tuner Studio to adjust my settings. I have a MSII with 2.3 code loaded. I know I'm working in the past I just havne't felt like getting up under the dash to load the latest software.

As for why I'm switching to alpha-n. I did some reading/searching and there was a thread about lumpy cams and how speed density may not deliver the best solution. Since I was having issues getting certian areas to be consistant in 2nd and 3rd I thought i'd give it a try.
grippo
Site Admin
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:55 pm

Re: Help with Alpha-N

Post by grippo »

In addition to filling out the table you have to choose the alphaN option (blend map and tps) and select the Rpm region in which you want to use alphaN and where you want to use SD. Basically there are 3 options:
No alphaN

alphaN below Rpm1, a tps/map blend between Rpm1 and Rpm2, and map above Rpm2

The reverse of the previous, that is map below Rpm1.

Obviously by selecting very high or very low Rpm1,2 you can get pure alphaN or pure SD.
442olds
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:02 pm

Re: Help with Alpha-N

Post by 442olds »

Ok, so let me make sure I understand.

If I set RPM 1 (labled as Pure Alpha-n to blend...) to say 6000 rpm, and I set RPM 2 (Blend to SD Threshold) to say 7000

The alpha-n area is 0-6000, the blend area is 6000-7000, and the SD area is above 7000 rpm.

And if I never want to see any SD I would set Rpm 1 to say 8000 rpm (redline of motor is 6500) and rpm 2 to say 10,000 rpm, that will give me pure alpha-n all the time right?
442olds
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:02 pm

Re: Help with Alpha-N

Post by 442olds »

I think I cleared up the question above this post but I have come up with a new one...

When viewing the Data Logs in relation to the MAP readings that show up...are those the calculated MAP readings from the Alpha-n table or are they the true MAP readings from the MAP sensor?
grippo
Site Admin
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:55 pm

Re: Help with Alpha-N

Post by grippo »

The Map column in the datalog is the sensor reading, but there is a variable called calcMap that can be logged or displayed in a gauge. That is the equivalent MAp calculated from the specified blend of map/ tps in alphaN mode. (of course it is pure map or pure tps in those rpm regions where it is supposed to be pure SD and pure alphaN.
Post Reply