Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

For discussing injector selection,manifold modifications, throttle bodies, fuel supply system design and construction, and FIdle valves and IACs.
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
Dr. Righteous
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:30 am

Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

Post by Dr. Righteous »

Stock low profile intakes manifolds are of a dual plane design and the most popular (affordable) after market intakes are dual plane also. I notices that almost nobody is using these when they build an EFI port injection setup. Is there a good reason why? I know they are not used generally in max power application because there is no benefit to longer runners at higher RPMs. But for general use if the builder is after improved driveability and mileage; why not a dual plane?
Bernard Fife
Master Squirter
Posts: 475
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:54 pm

Re: Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

Post by Bernard Fife »

Dr.R,

You can use a dual plane, in theory. The reason most don't is that the ports are at different angles (and hence heights) at the head flange, and this makes positioning the fuel injectors for a common rail per bank much more difficult.

Also, the biggest advantage of a dual plane is that each plane draws from only 1/2 the throttles butterflies. This can mean a faster peak velocity through a carb, and hence better fuel metering and atomization (often referred to as a 'better signal'). With EFI, fuel metering and atomization is independent of peak air velocity in the throttle, so the gains aren't nearly the same as with a carb.

Lance.
"Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.” - George Bernard Shaw
patrickbrown
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:42 pm

Re: Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

Post by patrickbrown »

If you already have the dual plane then go ahead and use it. Although if you plan to modify it for port injection I probably wouldn't go to the trouble and expense. Start with a single plane for that.
Patrick Brown

MS2-V3 (2.891) - EDIS8
62 Ford Falcon - 331 Stroker
Dr. Righteous
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:30 am

Re: Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

Post by Dr. Righteous »

patrickbrown wrote:If you already have the dual plane then go ahead and use it. Although if you plan to modify it for port injection I probably wouldn't go to the trouble and expense. Start with a single plane for that.
Actually I have a stack of 'em. And they are readily available and generally cheaper for MoPars.
I'm sure single plane design manifolds are cheaper to produce but since they are consider more of a race piece the price is higher.
convertables_10
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:18 am

Re: Dual plane manifolds......OK, or NO way

Post by convertables_10 »

Ive got a dual plane performer rpm on mine. I can tell a difference between it and the single plane torker 2 I had on it. I gained low rpm power but traded off a little high rpm power. Im tbi though.
My MegaSquirt build 85 S-15 Jimmy 350/th350 TPI MS2 2.905 hei 8pin
1983 s-10 350 tpi injection MS2 soon
1984 s-10 Blazer 350/th350 and will get an MS2 tbi.
1973 Nova 5.3/glide 76mm turbo. MS3X
Post Reply