"Does fuel temperature make a significant difference to AFR and is there any existing way in MSII to correct for it?"
Normally resident in cold damp UK and all tuning has been done in those conditions. However, I have done alot of miles in France and Switzerland recently with temperature in the high 20s or low 30s ºC and found that the car was getting significantly better gas mileage, but still running really well. Presumably this means that my basic tune is still a bit richer than it needs to be and something was leaning it a little. Unfortunately no laptop to hand to see what was really going on but I'm guessing that two things could be causing this:
1. IAT was obviously up compared to tuning conditions - I've previously been suspicious that the IAT compensation takes a bit more fuel out than it should but as this has mostly becomes evident at low speed in traffic, I've always blamed heat soak - maybe a bit of both in reality! I know there is a way to compensate for this and will have to experiment.
2. As the fuel re-circulates and the tank is fairly small the fuel was getting properly hot - more than 45ºC. As this will reduce density and pulse width remains the same, less fuel will be injected. As far as I know, there is no way within MS to correct for this - maybe because it is considered un-necessary?
I'd like to reduce fuelling and enjoy the better economy all the time, but I'm also aware that if I do this without considering the above the car may run badly next time I take it somewhere hot......
Incidently, the car has done in excess of 5,500 miles since the beginning of August (2,958 in just 5 days
Thanks
Nick
Car is a 1967 Triumph Vitesse 2.0 running multipoint injection on a homemade plenum manifold. Ver 3.0 hardware, MSII processor, 2.89 firmware, MAP algorithm, barometric correction and also controlling ignition via EDIS 6. Big (for Europe) engine in a small car - it gets hot under the bonnet.